- #Trouble installing photoninja full
- #Trouble installing photoninja pro
- #Trouble installing photoninja software
- #Trouble installing photoninja code
It's rewarding and you get exactly what you want on the media you want. However, with modern inkjet technology from Epson and others it's more than economical to produce gallery grade prints at home on your own. I'll agree it makes little sense if all you want is 4圆's or something as specialized as a book.
#Trouble installing photoninja pro
Personally I haven't looked at it lately because I made the choice back in the LR2 days for that instead of Bibble Pro (I'm kinda glad I made that choice now), and so since I do a good bit of gaming decided to stick with Windows for my main desktop and also photo editing. Which means properly calibrated monitor, using ICC profiles for the printer & paper, and having every bit in the graphics stack (that needs it at least) to be aware of the color profiles. Not saying I don't love Linux, because I do, but while you might generally print elsewhere for much of your photo prints, you still need to have a fully color managed flow if you want the print to look the way you want. Linux is a perfectly valid OS for photo post-processing and in some ways better than windows for heavily multi-threaded workloads.
#Trouble installing photoninja full
Photobooks, large panorama prints, prints on Metal, Acrylic or Canvas aren't exactly the easiest thing to do with out a full professional setup. Getting your own printer makes little sense, in most cases it's a better idea to print at a professional laboratory rather than do it your self. If you really want a *nix OS and photography get a Mac and call it a day. I'm not saying it can't be done but it's so easy on more established operating systems (Windows and OSX) it makes little sense wasting time trying to set it up in freeware Linux. Good luck setting up a color calibrated workflow in Linux.
#Trouble installing photoninja software
If you do find software the meets your needs for organizing and developing photographs you'll then likely be interested in making prints. Linux is a crap platform for photography and here is why. There is nothing wrong with the version of Lightroom you use now. Despite being a long-time licensed AfterShot Pro owner. Personally, I still use LR 4.x in a Windows 7 virtual machine, because it works best for me. Darktable (if you can wrap your brain around the UI and tolerate the lack of speed) Lightzone UFRaw+gimp Digikam etc. There are much better Linux alternatives.
The long-term users and supporters, plugin developers, and unhappy folks like me ( Quicksand on that forum) are leaving in droves. Go to the AfterShot Pro forum, read a few threads, and drink in the customer dissatisfaction. Their library is buggy and selecting/deleting pictures from it will sometimes result in the WRONG ORIGINAL RAW FILES BEING DELETED from your hard disk - this has affected me personally. Highlight recovery is terrible, and the best you can hope for, in most cases, is a flat gray area with no detail around specular highlights sometimes you'll get pink rings. There are longstanding bugs that they have known about for literally years.
#Trouble installing photoninja code
They used to have an license with Picture Code for Noise Ninja, but that agreement has expired and it has been replaced with essentially nothing useful. It doesn't have any kind of decent high-ISO noise removal. New cameras go for a year or more without any support. Occasionally there are some signs of life, in the form of posts from Corel employees on their forum, but overall, it's pretty much dead: Sorry Corel, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice. It's essentially abandonware at this point, though Corel claims to support it, and they claim to be working on a 2.0 version. I have been a user since before Corel's acquisition - when it was Bibble Pro. AfterShot Pro is terrible terrible terrible terrible terrible.
0 kommentar(er)
